So already, in the first line of her poem "Song,"* Louise Glück talks about beautiful porcelain bowls made by an artisan she is getting to know. The bowls are white and whole, not green and broken and repaired with gold, like the one depicted on the cover of a greeting card I once bought. If anything or anyone in Glück's poetry has been broken, patched up, and enhanced by its own history never denied, it's the poet herself, who is often present in her own poems, including this new one. I love this poem. I'd also like to know why it's called "Song."
First of all, a warning: don't look to Glück's poetry to offer healing in the form of golden balms and salves to be applied to wounds that we humans typically experience--and that we often inflict on ourselves, intentionally or unintentionally. Rather, the gold that gleams in Glück's poems illuminates, sometimes harshly.
"Nunnery" by Scott Ketcham |
Compared to many of Glück's poems, "Song" is gentle and bright, though equally focused on the challenge of being truly alive. I believe it's a pandemic poem, since in the first stanza, the speaker immediately identifies the problem of getting material objects to someone else when humans are separated by distance that must be maintained:
Leo Cruz makes the most beautiful white bowls;
I think I must get some to you
but how is the question
in these times
"Aquatint 3" by Sylvia Plimack Mangold*** |
the names of the
I have a book
since to see the
In the next two stanzas, when the speaker contradicts a viewpoint Leo asserts, he asks that she leave the door open to the possibility that he's right:
Leo thinks the things man makes
are more beautiful
than what exists in nature
and I say no.
And Leo says
wait and see.
Human-made things as more beautiful than what occurs in nature? Talk about an assertion that could get an artisan kicked out of a lot of gatherings of those who consider beauty and nature synonymous.
"Edged Sod" by Scott Ketcham**** |