The governor of Maine's early January race-related comments about impregnated white girls and drug dealers and the aftermath of those comments prompted Margo to write; her piece, in italics, follows. Thank you, Margo, for letting me share it here.
An Open Letter to My White Brothers and Sisters
After his
remarks about drug dealers from New York with names like D-Money, Shifty and
Smoothie who “impregnate young white girls” before leaving Maine, there has
been a landslide of public rhetoric repudiating LePage’s speech as racist, and
even a petition on MoveOn.org calling for LePage to repudiate his own
speech. Mike Tipping and Ron Schmidt both
wrote thoughtful reflections on the ways his speech violates the values our
communities try to maintain.
LePage’s
speech indicates racialized thinking.
His explanations of his gaffe showed even more plainly that he really
did mean he was talking about white women being impregnated by men that he
pretends he didn’t mean to say were black.
In the minds of most readers or listeners there hasn’t been any question
his fictionalized drug dealers were black.
The BDN
cartoon Jan 9/10** showed LePage’s face as the joker with the caption “The Race
Card.” Actually, we as white people have
held all the aces and face cards in the race deck, whether we descend from
slaveholders or not. Whiteness was
institutionalized as an identity in North America to separate from and thereby
justify the enslavement of African people and their descendants.
The BDN
editorial rightly references the 1955 murder of Emmett Till, a Chicago
15-year-old who fell victim to horrific violence while visiting southern
relatives. The men who kidnapped,
tortured and killed him for whistling at one of their wives, acted on the
stereotype that white womanhood needs defense against sexual advances by black
men. This was only sixty years ago.
Last fall my literature students read James
Baldwin’s play “Blues for Mister Charlie”**** which Baldwin wrote in response to
the events surrounding Till’s murder. The play contains no suspense or question of guilt—the audience sees
Lyle Britten shoot Richard Henry in the first seconds of Act 1. The action centers upon the relationships
among white people: in particular Lyle, his wife Jo, and the town newspaper
editor Parnell Jones. Despite being
known for his liberal leanings and his friendship with the victim’s father,
Parnell discovers his deepest allegiance lies with his childhood friend Lyle,
the murderer. The play ends on a note
struck by Juanita, the murdered Richard’s girlfriend, who to Parnell’s question
“Can I join you on the march, Juanita?
Can I walk with you?” responds, “Well, we can walk in the same
direction, Parnell. Come. Don’t look like that. Let’s go on on.” We as white people have much work to do ourselves
before we can be good neighbors, allies, or family to people of color. And I am sure Paul LePage loves his family
and wants to do all that is best for them.
So rather
than calling for repudiation of this public utterance, we should let LePage’s speech
reveal the need for deep teaching among white people by white people about how
we have profited and continue to profit through white skin privilege, even if
we do not have access to privilege through other means such as social class,
gender, or religion.
* This photo is a screen shot of of Margo's LinkedIn profile photo.
** Screen shot of my own FB page on which I shared another person's post.
*** Screen shot of following web page: "The Joker." George Danby Editorial Cartoonist. Bangor Daily News, 08 Jan. 2016. Web. 23 Jan. 2016. <http://danbyink.bangordailynews.com/2016/01/08/the-joker/>.
**** Screen shot of one result of my "Blues for Mister Charlie Images" search: <cinema/photos/2013/03/greatest-african-american-plays.html#!032013-shows-star-cinema-plays-langston-hughes-black-nativiry>
Hi Joan,
ReplyDeleteAlthough white folks collectively have benefited, and still benefit from power and privilege, not all white folks buy into the behaviorally enacted ideology which sanction existent arrangements. So, please read my piece on a racially motivated event from not that long ago in my life; and please pay attention to the situated context of the racist act.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1wiEBIkFFT3nqNZnlsYbZ3IQIdqQJYHD1-wiMjVBSs8s/edit?usp=sharing
Hi, Charley--really enjoyed reading your piece; thanks for sharing. I concur that not all white folks enact existing arrangements, as you call them, but I do think that we benefit lots from being white, even when we're not aware of it. The juxtaposition of those two memorable events in your life is so striking--definitely illustrating two ways of being in the present, let alone in the future. Glad you had JPJ--and a JPJ--in your life and that you're writing about him.
ReplyDelete